you are here: home > history of the Institute


Ethnomusicology and ethnochoreology at the Institute during the nineties

Naila Ceribasic

(Narodna umjetnost, 35/1, 1998, pp 53-71)

The Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research is the only institution in the Republic of Croatia in which ethnomusicological research has been carried out - in the sense of research subject (folk music / folklore music / traditional music / music) and/or in the sense of the approach that connects music and culture. During the nineties the paradigm of any music in any context became legitimate but also the individualisation of conceptions, approaches and research themes. In between the principle of researching the plurality of music and music-making and the more narrow priorities of the profession, it is possible to single out several groups of themes and several approach features that appear as a special characteristic of this decade: manifoldness and changeability of folklore music and its role in the construction of identity; music and music-making of recently invisible human groups; music and power in the context of war; de/re-construction of (Croatian) ethnomusicology and applied etnomusicology.

Keywords: Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research, ethnomusico-logy, Croatia

Ethnomusicology and ethnochoreology at the Institute during the nineties

The Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research is the only institution in the Republic of Croatia in which ethnomusicological research has been carried out - in the sense of research subject (folk music / folklore music / traditional music / music) and/or in the sense of the approach that connects music and culture. During the nineties the paradigm of any music in any context became legitimate but also the individualisation of conceptions, approaches and research themes. In between the principle of researching the plurality of music and music-making and the more narrow priorities of the profession, it is possible to single out several groups of themes and several approach features that appear as a special characteristic of this decade: manifoldness and changeability of folklore music and its role in the construction of identity; music and music-making of recently invisible human groups; music and power in the context of war; de/re-construction of (Croatian) ethnomusicology and applied etnomusicology.

The Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research is the only institution in the Republic of Croatia in which ethnomusicological research has been continuously carried out since its establishment until this day - either in the sense of research subject (folk music / folklore music / traditional music / music) or, more recently, in the sense of the approach that connects music and culture (music in culture, music as culture, culture in music, culture as music). Its associates are the only lecturers of ethnomusicology at degree-granting educational institutions in Zagreb, and among the current eleven holders of scholarly titles acquired on the basis of ethnomusicological work, six of them are employees of the Institute (three Doctors of Science and three Masters of Science). Therefore, to speak of Croatian ethnomusicology (and of Croatian ethnochoreology, too) during the last fifty years - in the sense of institutionalised, framed and supposedly indisputable production and distribution of knowledge - means in fact to deal with the activities of the Institute’s department for folklore music and dance, even if, at the moment, this comes down to six ethnomusicologists and one ethnochoreologist.

Folk music, folklore music

When the Institute was established in 1948, the notion of folk music [narodna glazba] was based on the conceptions of the Seljacka sloga [Peasant Concord], an organisation that had complete supervision over its definition and public practice in the preceding decade. Folk music was the term for only those musical products (songs and dances in view of their sound organisation) that the Concord’s experts had legitimated as Croatian, peasant, old-time and local. These were original, pure and dignified, accepted through oral tradition, resistant to changes caused by foreign influences, collective and unprofessional at the levels of creating and performing, and almost identified with national music (see e.g. Herceg 1940:59-60, Bratanic 1941:14, 47).

The ethnomusicologist Vinko Zganec, the Institute’s first employee, continued his previously started work on "collecting and notating folk melodies", and as an expert commissioner began attending festivals of folk music and dance. Like the visits to the villages, the festivals offered the opportunity to collect and notate, but the experts were also expected to judge to which degree the performed songs and dances adhered to the current concept of folk music. In the meantime, this concept had lost its stability. Only old-time, only Croatian and only peasant as the essentials for that which was allowed to be called folk, could no longer be valid, at least officially, loudly and publicly. The "brotherhood and unity" of Yugoslav nations (in the case of Croatia, especially that of Croats and Serbs), the "working people" (comprised of the peasantry and the working class), and "enlightenment in the spirit of socialist development" - as the proclaimed principles of the new state - required a new concept of folk culture and folk music within it. How Vinko Zganec and other associates of the Institute mediated between personal and professional beliefs and the requests of the power system, and to which degree the broadening of that time of the approach of Croatian science of (folk) music sprouted from within itself and how much it was a consequence of negotiations with expectations from above, I shall leave to be discerned from the preceding article in this volume.

Likewise, I shall not dwell on the period of the nineteen seventies and eighties. It should however be stated that at that time a second important approach widening was taking place. Under the influence of American folklorists (especially Dundes 1964, Ben-Amos 1971) and folklorists from the Institute’s department for oral literature (especially Boskovic-Stulli 1973, Lozica 1979), the ethnomusicological paradigm became folklore music [folklorna glazba], i.e. music that is accepted, performed and carried forward freely and spontaneously, through the direct communication of relatively small groups of performers and listeners (Bezic 1981:27; see also Bezic 1974a:151, 1977:23-25, 37, 1985:442). Emphasis was put on the communicational aspect of music. Greatest attention was given to the performance (performing situation) in which the performers and the audience are not separated, but interact with each other and can (and do) exchange roles, so that in the new situation the listeners can (and do) become the performers and vice versa (see Lozica 1979:46, Marosevic 1982:1-2). This kind of performance became the "term of reference of the folklority of music" (Marosevic 1993a). The key words of the new approach - context, performance, communication and process were, however, stressed more as terms to which full attention should be given, than actually given such a position. "Although the importance of context in which music is performed was observed and emphasised, and the way of life and the particularity of such a performance of musical content were stated even as the basic component... of folklore music, ... the specific manner of [folklore, note N.C.] performance was considered more as an exterior criterion for recognising the musical contents that needed to be studied, and context more as one of the criteria for classifying the collected musical material" (Marosevic 1992b:125). More often than not, the central pages of scholarly papers were dedicated to the analysis of the sound aspect of authentic ("still living") regional musical traditions jeopardised by contemporary social change. Likewise, in the field of ethnochoreology "dance alone, dance as the result of dancing", reconstructed according to the memories of the older village population, retained the central position, regardless of the idea of the importance of contemporary dance events, context and performance (see Zebec 1996:104).

So, compared to earlier decades, Croatian ethnomusicological texts during the seventies and eighties did not change fundamentally, but there is no doubt that the oppositions to the scholarly relevant - that until then had been excluded from the researches - became worthy of scholarly attention (e.g. new layers of traditional music, urban, author, heterogeneous, historically changeable music and music-making). Field researches, still based on conversation with older narrators and music-
-making for research purposes, nevertheless began to include authentic performance situations (e.g. observing and participating in real weddings instead of the descriptions of old-time weddings). In addition to the extensive, intensive field research started to be conducted. One of the basic products of the profession until that time - collections of folk tunes of various regions - almost disappeared, while the holdings of recorded audio and audio-visual material have grown. The questions of origin and diffusion of the sound structure of a specific song or dance, or of the certain musical characteristic (tone relations, meter and rhythm, musical forms) left the focus of scholarly interest. If not the actual, at least the normative performance context became an important piece of information that could, as it started to be regarded, contribute to the better understanding of a music phenomenon. The person who performs (and therefore creates, too) a certain music became noticeable (this was less the case with the recipient, even if he/she were a member of the same group). Following Merriam, besides the sound aspect of music, attention was gradually being given to the concepts about music in a certain cultural environment, to the person who is making music, and to the uses and functions of music (see Merriam 1964:32, 210).

Because musicality is a universal, species-specific characteristic

It seems to me that these announced, and partly intentionally cautious shifts fully came out in the second half of the nineteen eighties. Together with the folkloristic literature that was mentioned earlier, two of the probably most influential and most often quoted ethnomusicological books - Merriam’s The Anthropology of Music (1964) and Blacking’s How Musical is Man (1976) started to be read attentively from then onwards. The paradigm of any music in any context became legitimate on one hand, and the individualisation of conceptions, approaches and research themes, on the other. This refers to the discourse of the profession, the consensus of individuals - ethnomusicologists gathered at the Institute. However, the immersion in a cultural, social and political environment imposes certain priorities. So, for example, no Croatian ethnomusicologist has tackled the area of so called art music and therefore, with one exception, no one has researched music cultures distant to Croatia. Since "folklore music and dance are an important... part of national cultural heritage that deserves and requires continuous attention", the contemporary ethnomusicological activity of the Institute is orientated in six directions (see Ceribasic, Marosevic and Pettan 1997:6-9):

1. Critical consideration of past and present-day research results and the work on the synthesis - there is no complete critical bibliography, no reference book in ethnomusicology for students, nor synthetical reviews on Croatian traditional music and Croatian ethnomusicology;

2. Examination of insufficiently investigated themes - many relevant themes have been investigated insufficiently or not at all, owing to earlier pressures of the communist ideology, due to a small number of employees and/or because of a more narrow research paradigm (i.e. traditional church folk singing, musical and dance traditions of Croats in the diaspora, music and music-making of national minorities in Croatia, the field of ethnoorganology, music and dance in the context of politics and war, folk revival);

3. Elaboration, protection and publishing of archival material, especially from war afflicted areas and areas for which the published material is still limited, as well as the protection of the entire material (especially audio material and manuscripts) according to contemporary standards (compact disc, microfilm, scanning);

4. Continuous observation of traditional and contemporary musical and dance phenomena, especially in multicultural and multiethnic regions and in areas in which the population has changed as a consequence of the recent war;

5. Complete and objective presentation of Croatian traditional music and dance abroad - since world ethnomusicological literature lacks data on Croatian music and dance or contains data that is deficient and/or interpreted almost exclusively in a wider Southern Slav (Yugoslav) or Balkan context, it is necessary to intensify the presence of Croatian ethnomusicologists in the international scholarly community and to intensify research from the perspective of contemporary ethnomusicology and ethnochoreology;

6. Efforts connected to improving ethnomusicological studies, either by extending the curriculum, by combining the existing studies with other study groups or by establishing separate interdisciplinary studies.

***

In between the principle of researching the plurality of music and music--making on one hand and the more narrow priorities of the profession on the other, without any pretence to comprehensiveness, it is possible to single out several groups of themes and several approach features that appear as a special characteristic of the ethnomusicological activities of the Institute in this decade.

The first group is based on three key words: folklore music or traditional music, manifoldness and changeability. It comprises of mature folkloristic research of music as performance and communication (see Marosevic 1990, 1992a, 1993a), of research into the relationship between the normative and the individual according to the criterion of musical text, texture and context (see Ceribasic 1994), and of anthropologically oriented investigation into the relationships between conceptions about music, music sound and the uses and functions of music (see Bonifacic 1990, 1991a). Therefore, since the a priori definition of music and music--making worthy of scholarly attention has disappeared (and not just as a matter of principle, but in real practice), and since the questions of who, how, when, in which circumstances and why have become equally important as the question of what, "the music world" has shown itself immanently "manifold" and historically changeable. It appears as such whether we are dealing with the relatively homogeneous, standard Croatian folklore music regions (see Bonifacic 1991b, Ceribasic 1992, Bezic 1993b), regions that were considered transitive anyway (see Marosevic 1993a), Croatian communities in the diaspora (see Bezic 1995a, 1996b, Bonifacic 1996a, Djaleta 1997b), musical genre that, as was thought earlier, represents the source of entire Croatian folk music (see Marosevic 1994) or with the manner of reception of traditional music making during several centuries (see Bezic 1996a). The confrontation with manifoldness and changeability has often been linked to the problem node of constructing the identity, primarily cultural, regional and ethnic. Mostly the attention was directed at the ways of preserving identity through music.

The second, smaller group consists of works in which the focus of interest are human groups that were avoided by research on folk music (because of their emphasised aberration from the canon that is denoted and connoted by the concept of folk music and/or because of their existence on the margin of the discourse of power). Guided by Blacking’s humanizing orientation, the right to their own culture and history was acquired by groups that had so far been scholarly hidden or blurred, such as travelling musicians (see Marosevic 1993b, 1997c), women (see Ceribasic 1995b, Marosevic 1995b) and homosexuals (see Pettan 1996c). With somewhat less animosity from the perspective of earlier paradigm, these groups could be subjoined, for example, by urban klapa singers (see Djaleta 1997a), Gypsy musicians (see Pettan 1992a, 1992b, 1996e) or uncollective, individual singers (see Ceribasic 1994).

The third group comprises of research initiated by the reality of war. In an environment of political changes and war, the context, performance, communication and process flared in their sometimes even shocking changeability. The power of music was revealed as well as the power of wider social strategies over music (this is why in the introduction I have used the syntagm culture as music and not just music as culture). The ethnomusicological field has literally become the entirety of the world in which we live, and not just a special place to which one should travel supplied with audio-visual equipment. The emic and the etic imposed themselves in the pluralism of their relations. The influence of the power system on scholarly writing began to be recognised, the relationship between the researcher and the researched started to be questioned, and rival views on musics and musics as conveyers of different worldviews began to be considered. I would say that the war influenced even the researches that do not deal with it and are apparently very distant from war issues. Once again, more emphasized, there is the question of who is referring to whom and in which situation? In distinction from the seventies, it seems that the shift of the paradigm - - with key reference terms: the "subjectivity" of the researcher, the field is everything, I/We and Others, the pervasion of fictional and real - did not occur through the acceptance of contemporary world anthropological and ethnomusicological thought (although the shift in the seventies could/should be examined in the context of the political climate of greater liberalisation of that time), but reversely: personal experience (perceived emotionally first, and then rationalised) had found points of contact with the appearing postmodern critique (e.g. Clifford and Marcus 1986).

In articles more closely connected to the theme of music in the context of war events, the role of music as an incentive and provocation during the process of disintegration of the former state was analysed (see Pettan 1994), the war music production of opposed sides was compared (see Pettan 1993, 1994, Ceribasic 1995a), the national, transnational, cultural and gender stereotypes in/through music were deconstructed (see Pettan 1996a, 1996b, Ceribasic 1995a), the way in which cultural, historical, national and political connotations of tambura musicianship (currently the central Croatian national symbol in music) have been brought to life and transformed was examined (see Bonifacic 1993, 1995), the use of the Slavonian round dance as a political ritual and a symbolic expression of national unity, but also of regional specificity was considered (see Zebec 1995a, 1997), and changes in musical repertoire due to changes in the political system were documented (see Bezic 1993a, Ceribasic 1993). Rather than at the traditional music, attention was aimed at the field of popular music because it was the central point of encounters, negotiation, conflict, reconciliation and resistance.

Zero years

A separate, largish fourth group is comprised of works that result from a certain sense of zero years. These works include (auto)reflection, summarising and synthesising of the profession and are affirmatively and actively orientated towards the forming of "new times". Already during the war and especially after it, it started to be realised that age, gender, educational, class, ethnic, religious, psychological and other distinctive features that are incorporated in each of us effect our interpretation of data (thus, the scholar contributes to the creation of a certain discourse, too). At the same time, it started to be realised that it is the very self confrontation with such given conditions (see Ceribasic 1993, Pettan 1993) or the simultaneous double position of the researcher and the active musician (see Caleta 1997a, 1997b) that leads to better understanding of the phenomenon being researched, even if (or precisely because of the fact that) there is a gradual and unhidden change in the approach to and in the understanding of the researched subject (see Pettan 1997). In a somewhat broader framework of synthetic consideration of the discipline, in recent years emphasis has been laid upon examination of the theoretical framework of communicably conceived folkloristics and on the mode of its appliance in ethnomusicological research in Croatia in the last twenty years or so (see Marosevic 1992b, 1995a). Accentuation has also been on investigating theoretical and methodological aspects of ethnochoreological research in Croatia in regard of the achievements of critical ethnology and anthropology, i.e. the European and American paradigm in dance research (see Zebec 1993, 1995c, 1996). On the basis of several decades of scholarly research, Ivan Ivancan wrote a book on Croatian folk dance customs and the scenic application of folklore (see Ivancan 1996). Besides, in this decade several synthetic articles have appeared about a theme which has been relatively neglected till now - traditional church folk singing, especially in the context of traditional customs (see Bezic 1995b, 1997a, 1997b).

The second aspect of the sense of zero years is contained in the consideration of the field of applied ethnomusicology. A very useful potential for Croatia’s reconstruction and development lies in applying the research results in regard to the life of music in an individual, local, regional, national and transnational context. The breadth of ethnomusicological views as well as interweaving of Croatian ethnomusicological tradition with contemporary world-wide tendencies are a specific guarantee of a balanced relationship between the demands of national culture and the multicultural reality of today’s world (see Ceribasic, Marosevic and Pettan 1997:9-10). It is possible to apply the results of ethnomusicological research in the educational and pedagogical process, in programmes that help people to overcome the consequences of war, in mass communication media, in organising folklore festivals, in the work of amateur groups that nurture local heritage, in neo-traditional music and dance, in tourism.

It could be stated that the appliance of ethnomusicological knowledge is one of the traditions of Croatian ethnomusicology. This is especially the case with the participation in the forming of folklore festivals and with the assistance given to amateur folklore groups. In this framework, the basic question which poses itself is whether the foothold idea of genuine traditional values of folk culture (peasant, old time, Croatian, local, etc.) and of their return to everyday life can and should be still sustainted, or could (should) the organised folklore activity and festivals be more open to a wider repertoire and various performers, support various traditional folklore manners of performing, create new performing frames and types of performances, and thereby contribute to the change of a (still frequent) general negative attitude to traditional music and musicians, strengthen local communities in society as a whole and stimulate new forms of national integration based on inclusiveness (see Ceribasic 1996). The second important aspect of appliance refers to the participation in programmes directed at overcoming the consequences of war - building respect and understanding between people, e.g. between the autochthons and refugees that found themselves, as victims of ethnic cleansing, in a new, completely unfamiliar environment (see Pettan 1995a), between people that belonged to opposed sides during the war (see Pettan 1995b) or between different ethnic groups in areas of prolonged conflict (see Pettan 1996d). Music makes this possible because it has the dual power to strengthen identity and stimulate intercultural communication.

The third aspect of the zero years consists of efforts to reconstruct fractions of history very carefully, attentively and as objectively as possible, to collect and arrange fragments of a different, forgotten, disappearing, endangered world (see Marosevic 1994, 1997a, 1997b, Bonifacic 1996b). Within the framework of such endeavours, the initiated project of digitalisation and restoration of the Institute’s record and tape library is especially important, and more important than the critical editions of collections of folk songs (e.g. Zganec 1990, 1992). A repeated orientation to the idyllic past? I don’t think so. Rather - everyone’s right to his/her own expression, past and present. Eros instead of Tanatos. Ethnomusicological knowledge and approaches can be of assistance in this.

(Translated by Laurette Rako-Zechner)

References cited

Ben-Amos, Dan. 1971. "Towards a Definition of Folklore in Context." Journal of American Folklore 84:3-15.
Bezic, Jerko. 1974a. "Akulturacija kao mogucnost daljeg zivljenja folklorne glazbe." Zvuk, 2:149-154.
Bezic, Jerko. 1974b. "Raznolik glazbeni svijet sire okolice Donje Stubice." Narodna umjetnost 10:309-377.
Bezic, Jerko. 1977. "Dalmatinska folklorna gradska pjesma kao predmet etnomuzikoloskog istrazivanja." Narodna umjetnost 14:23-54.
Bezic, Jerko. 1981. "Folklorna glazba otoka Zlarina." Narodna umjetnost 18:27--148.
Bezic, Jerko. 1985. "Uz diskusiju o predmetu etnomuzikoloskog istrazivanja." U Zbornik radova 32. kongresa Saveza udruzenja folklorista Jugoslavije (1985, Sombor), ur. M. Veselinovic Sulc. Novi Sad: Udruzenje folklorista SAP Vojvodine, 441-444.
Bezic, Jerko. 1993a. "Hrvatske crkvene i nabozne pucke pjesme od 1990. i otada." Arti musices 24/2:159-183.
Bezic, Jerko. 1993b. "Istocnoalpske (austrijske) osobine u folklornom glazbovanju sjeverozapadne Hrvatske." U Hrvatsko-austrijske usporednice = Kroatisch-österreichische Parallelen, prir. N. Ritig Beljak i Lj. Marks. Zagreb: Hrvatsko-austrijsko drustvo za njegovanje kulturnih i gospodarskih odnosa, 71-97.
Bezic, Jerko. 1995a. "Folklorna glazba gradiscanskih Hrvata." U Povijest i kultura gradiscanskih Hrvata, ur. J. Kampus. Zagreb: Globus, 361-402.
Bezic, Jerko. 1995b. "Hrvatske (pucke) bozicne pjesme." U Dunja Rihtman-Augustin: Knjiga o Bozicu. Bozic i bozicni obicaji u hrvatskoj narodnoj kulturi. Zagreb: Golden marketing, 161-173.
Bezic, Jerko. 1996a. "Approaches to the People’s Music-Life in Dalmatia (Croatia) in the Past and Present." Narodna umjetnost 33/1:75-88.
Bezic, Jerko. 1996b. "Music-Making of Croats Outside Their Mother Country." U Echo der Vielfalt. Traditionelle Musik von Minderheiten / ethnischen Gruppen = Echoes of Diversity. Traditional Music of Ethnic Groups / Minorities , ur. U. Hemetek i E. H. Lubej. Wien: Böhlau Verlag, 189-202.
Bezic, Jerko. 1997a. "Glagoljasko pjevanje." U Hrvatska i Europa. Kultura, znanost i umjetnost. Srednji vijek (VII.-XII. stoljece), ur. I. Supicic. Zagreb: Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti - A.G.M., 569-576.
Bezic, Jerko. 1997b. "Tradicijski napjevi hrvatskih korizmenih i uskrsnih pjesama." U Jasna »apo Zmegac: Hrvatski uskrsni obicaji, korizmeno uskrsni obicaji hrvatskog puka u prvoj polovici XX. stoljeca. Svakidasnjica, pucka poboznost, zajednica. Zagreb: Golden marketing, 211-243.
Blacking, John. 1976. How Musical is Man. London: Faber & Faber.
Blacking, John. 1987. "A Commonsense View of All Music." Reflections on Percy Grainger’s Contribution to Ethnomusicology and Music Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bonifacic, Ruza. 1990. "Tradicijsko pjevanje u Puntu na otoku Krku." Magistarski rad na Muzickoj akademiji u Sarajevu. Rukopis u Institutu za etnologiju i folkloristiku, IEF rkp 1370.
Bonifacic, Ruza. 1991a. "’Mi cemo zakantat glason od slavica.’ Koncepcije izvodjaca o tradicijskom pjevanju u Puntu na otoku Krku." Narodna umjetnost 28:49-85.
Bonifacic, Ruza. 1991b. "Prilog istrazivanju bimuzikalnosti na primjerima pjevacica iz Punta na otoku Krku" = "A Contribution to the Research of Bi-Musicality Based on the Examples of Singers from Punat on the Island of Krk." U Folklor i njegova umetnicka transpozicija. Referati sa naucnog skupa = Folklore and Its Artistic Transposition. Proceeding of Scientific Assembly (1991, Beograd), ur. V. Pericic et al. Beograd: Fakultet muzicke umetnosti, 35-46, 47-63.
Bonifacic, Ruza. 1993. "Uloga rodoljubnih pjesama i tamburaske glazbe u Hrvatskoj pocetkom 1990-ih. Primjer neotradicionalne grupe ’Zlatni dukati’." Arti musices 24/2:185-222.
Bonifacic, Ruza. 1995. "Changing of Symbols. The Folk Instrument Tamburica as a Political and Cultural Phenomenon." Collegium Antropologicum 19/1:65-77.
Bonifacic, Ruza. 1996a. "Amateur Theatre Songs of Burgenland Croats (Austria). Towards the Preservation of Ethnic Identity." U Echo der Vielfalt. Traditionelle Musik von Minderheiten / ethnischen Gruppen = Echoes of Diversity. Traditional Music of Ethnic Groups / Minorities , ur. U. Hemetek i E. H. Lubej. Wien: Böhlau Verlag, 215-224.
Bonifacic, Ruza. 1996b. "Tarankanje. A Disappearing Music Tradition." Narodna umjetnost 33/1:149-170.
Bratanic, Branimir. 1941. O smotrama hrvatske seljacke kulture. Zagreb: Seljacka sloga.
Boskovic-Stulli, Maja. 1973. "O pojmovima usmena i pucka knjizevnost i njihovim nazivima." Umjetnost rijeci 17/3:149-184; 17/4:237-260.
Ceribasic, Naila. 1992. "Slavonska folklorna glazba kroz koncepcije smotri i istrazivanja." Narodna umjetnost 29:297-322.
Ceribasic, Naila. 1993. "Glazbeni repertoar na svadbama u Slavonskoj Podravini (Istocna Hrvatska) prije i poslije politickih promjena u Hrvatskoj 1990. godine." Arti musices 24/2:223-228.
Ceribasic, Naila. 1994. "Norma i individuacija u deseterackim napjevima s podrucja Slavonije." Narodna umjetnost 31:145-282.
Ceribasic, Naila. 1995a. "Gender Roles during the War. Representations in Croatian and Serbian Popular Music 1991-1992." Collegium Antropologicum 19/1: 91-101.
Ceribasic, Naila. 1995b. "Violence of Totalitarin Regime. ’The Purity and Beauty’ of Croatian Music, ’Duties, the Pains and Fruits’ of Motherhood, and the Male ’Force of the Creative Master of the World’ in the Independent State of Croatia (the NDH) 1941-1945." U International Conference Music, Violence, War and Gender (1995, Punat). Abstracts of Papers, ur. N. Ceribasic i G. Doliner. Zagreb: Matrix Croatica - Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research, 7.
Ceribasic, Naila. 1996. "Buducnost smotri. Od izvornog k autenticnom?" U 30. Medjunarodna smotra folklora, ur. E. Krpan. Zagreb: Koncertna direkcija Zagreb, 100-102.
Ceribasic, Naila, Grozdana Marosevic, i Svanibor Pettan. 1997. "Etnomuzikologija i tradicijska glazba u Hrvatskoj. Prilog raspravi o nacionalnom programu njegovanja znanstvene i kulturne bastine." Rukopis u Institutu za etnologiju i folkloristiku, IEF rkp 1622.
Clifford, James, i George E. Marcus (ur.). 1986. Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley - Los Angeles - London: University of California Press.
Ćaleta, Josko. 1997a. "Klapa Singing. A Traditional Folk Phenomenon of Dalmatia." Narodna umjetnost 34/1:127-145.
Ćaleta, Josko. 1997b. "Klapa u dijaspori. Klapa ’Zvonimir’, Vancouver, Canada." Bascinski glasi 6:71-91.
Dundes, Alan. 1964. "Texture, Text, and Context." Southern Folklore Quarterly 20:251-265.
Herceg, Rudolf. 1940. "Posteni put Seljacke Sloge. O tom ovisi sudbina hrvatstva i svega seljactva." Seljacka sloga 5/3:58-61.
Herndon, Marcia, i Norma McLeod. 1990. Music as Culture. Richmond: MRI Press.
Ivancan, Ivan. 1996. Narodni plesni obicaji u Hrvata. Zagreb: Hrvatska matica iseljenika - Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku.
Lozica, Ivan. 1979. "Metateorija u folkloristici i filozofija umjetnosti." Narodna umjetnost 16:33-55.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1982. "Oblici zastite folklorne glazbe." Rukopis u Institutu za etnologiju i folkloristiku, IEF rkp 1295. [Objavljeno u Zbornik radova 29. kongresa Saveza udruzenja folklorista Jugoslavije (1982, Hvar), ur. T. -uric, 1991. Zagreb: Hrvatsko drustvo folklorista, 347-349.].
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1990. "Samice ili rozgalice - oblici pjevanih poruka." U Rad 37. kongresa Saveza udruzenja folklorista Jugoslavije (1990, Plitvicka jezera), ur. T. -uric. Zagreb: Drustvo folklorista Hrvatske, 50--54.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1992a. "Culture as a Determinant of Folk-Singing Style. Group and Solo Singing in the Karlovacko Pokuplje Region." International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 23/2:207-221.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1992b. "Folklorna glazba - predmet etnomuzikologije. Koncepcije etnomuzikologije u Hrvatskoj u proteklom desetljecu." Arti musices 23/2:115-128.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1993a. "Izvedba kao odrednica folklornosti glazbe. Etnomuzikolosko istrazivanje u Karlovackom pokuplju." Disertacija na Filozofskom fakultetu u Zagrebu. Rukopis u Institutu za etnologiju i folkloristiku, IEF rkp 1429.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1993b. "Prilog proucavanju putujucih glazbenika u Hrvatskoj." U Glazba, ideje i drustvo. Svecani zbornik za Ivana Supicica = Music, Ideas, and Society. Essays in Honour of Ivan Supicic, ur. S. Tuksar. Zagreb: Hrvatsko muzikolosko drustvo, 199-213.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1994. "Ojkanje u izvandinarskim podrucjima Hrvatske." Etnoloska tribina 17:91-102.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1995a. "The Influence of Folkloristics on Ethnomusicology in Croatia." Narodna umjetnost 32/1:39-54.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1995b. "Samica Songs as Traditional Forms of Women’s Expression in the Karlovac Region (Central Croatia)." U International Conference Music, Violence, War and Gender (1995, Punat). Abstracts of Papers, ur. N. Ceribasic i G. Doliner. Zagreb: Matrix Croatica - Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research, 13.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1997a. "Musiques traditionnelles de Croatie" = "Croatian Traditional Music" = "Hrvatska folklorna glazba." U [komentar uz kompaktdisk] Croatie. Musiques d’autrefois = Croatia. Music of Long Ago, prir. G. Marosevic. Paris: Ocora - Radio France, 1-28.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1997b. "Podaci o glazbi u monografijama Zbornika za narodni zivot i obicaje juznih Slavena." Narodna umjetnost 34/2:95-107.
Marosevic, Grozdana. 1997c. "Travelling Musicians in Croatia and Their Role in the Creation of Popular Musical Culture." U Historical Studies on Folk and Traditional music, ur. D. Stockmann i J. H. Koudal. Copenhagen: Danish Folklore Archives - Museum Tusculanum Press, 121-130.
Merriam, Alan P. 1964. The Anthropology of Music. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Moisala, Pirkko (ur.). 1994. "Ethnomusicology in Finland." Ethnomusicology 38/3:399-422.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1992a. "Gypsy Music in Kosovo. Interaction and Creativity." Disertacija na University of Maryland, SAD. Rukopis u Institutu za etnologiju i folkloristiku, IEF rkp 1419.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1992b. "Lambada in Kosovo. A Profile of Gypsy Creativity." Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society 2:117-130.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1993. "Etnomuzikolog u Hrvatskoj, etnomuzikolog i rat." Arti musices 24/2:153-168.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1994. "Glasba kot spodbuda in provokacija v casih jugoslovanske dezintegracije." U Slovenski glasbeni dnevi 1993. Provokacija v glasbi, ur. P. Kuret. Ljubljana: Festival, 103-111.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1995a. "Uloga znanstvenika u stvaranju pretpostavki za suzivot. Ususret primijenjenoj etnomuzikologiji." Narodna umjetnost 32/2:217-234.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1995b. "Volksmusik der Kroaten und Serben in Kroatien. Ein Mittel für Wissenschaftler, den Friedensprozess zu fördern." Referat za znanstveni skup Nationalismus und Regionalismus in der Volksmusik und in der Volksmusikforschung. Prag, 13.-15. 7. 1995.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1996a. "Balkan Popular Music? No, Thanks. The View from Croatia." U Simpozij Balkanska popularna glasba = Conference Balkan Popular Music (1996, Ljubljana) [apstrakt], ur. J. Vogrinc. Ljubljana: Institutum Studiorum Humanitatis, 12. [cjeloviti tekst - "Hrvatska i Balkanite. Etnomuzikolozki perspektivi." Balkanistic forum 6, 1997, 2:32-42.].
Pettan, Svanibor. 1996b. "The Croats and the Question of Their Mediterranean Musical Identity". Ethnomusicology OnLine 3. WEB stranica: http://research.umbc.edu/eol/3/html.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1996c. "Female to Male - Male to Female. Third Gender in the Musical Life of the Gypsies in Kosovo." Narodna umjetnost 33/2:311-
-324.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1996d. "Gypsies, Music and Politics in the Balkans. A Case Study from Kosovo." The World of Music 38/1:33-61.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1996e. "Selling Music. Rom Musicians and the Music Market in Kosovo." U Echo der Vielfalt. Traditionelle Musik von Minderheiten / ethnischen Gruppen = Echoes of Diversity. Traditional Music of Ethnic Groups / Minorities, ur. U. Hemetek i E. H. Lubej. Wien: Böhlau Verlag, 233-245.
Pettan, Svanibor. 1997. "Glasba, politika in vojna iz perspektive vpletenega. Ocenjevanje avtobiografskih podatkov" = "Music, Politics, and War from an Insider’s Perspective. Evaluation of Autobiographical Data." Studi slavi 8 [Vrednovanje zivljenskih pricevanj = Evoluation of Biographies = Die Bewertung von Lebenszeugnissen]: 234-252.
Shils, Edward. 1981. Tradition. London - Boston: Faber & Faber.
Zebec, Tvrtko. 1993. "Kulturno antropoloski pristup plesu. Pregled teorijskih pristupa istrazivanju plesa i primjer istrazivanja plesnih dogadjaja u pokladnim obicajima Punta na otoku Krku." Magistarski rad na Filozofskom fakultetu u Ljubljani. Rukopis u Institutu za etnologiju i folkloristiku, IEF rkp 1442.
Zebec, Tvrtko. 1995a. "The Dance Event as a Political Ritual. The Round Dance - Kolo ’Slavonia at War’." Collegium Antropologicum 19/1:79-91.
Zebec, Tvrtko. 1995b. "Kulturni identitet vrboveckog kraja u scenskom folklornom izrazu." U Vrbovec u proslosti i sadasnjosti. Radovi sa znanstvenog skupa posvecenog 750. obljetnici pisanog spomenika o Vrbovcu, ur. B. »egec. Vrbovec: Ogranak Matice hrvatske, 113-128.
Zebec, Tvrtko. 1995c. "O teorijah in metodah raziskovanja plesa." Traditiones 24:301-307.
Zebec, Tvrtko. 1996. "Dance Research in Croatia." Narodna umjetnost 33/1:89-111.
Zebec, Tvrtko. 1997. "Surviving through the Dance. Sung Round Dance as the Expression of Defiance and Croatian Pride." Cultural Survival Quarterly 20/4:29-32.
Zganec, Vinko (sakupio). 1990. Hrvatske pucke popijevke iz Medjimurja. Knjiga 1. Prir. J. Bezic i G. Marosevic. Zagreb: Zavod za istrazivanje folklora.
Zganec, Vinko (sakupio). 1992. Hrvatske pucke popijevke iz Medjimurja. Knjiga 2. Prir. J. Bezic i R. Bonifacic. Zagreb: Institut za etnologiju i folkloristiku.





     (c)   Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research 2004.      Contact       Impressum